Advocacy
Blog Home All Blogs
Our Public Policy Committee and Advocacy Community assist physicians in getting their voices heard on the issues that matter most to them.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: Advocacy  COTS  Federal Policy  State Policy Update  HPP Funding  Ohio Budget  Public Policy  HPP 

CMA Federal Policy Update

Posted By Columbus Medical Association - CMA, Thursday, June 12, 2025

CMA Federal Policy Update 

Federal Budget

President’s Budget Slashes the Hospital Preparedness Program

What is it?

  • President Trump’s budget proposes a drastic reduction in federal funding to the Hospital Preparedness Program, the program that coordinates healthcare preparedness and response. In Central Ohio, the HPP is coordinated by COTS.  

What does it mean?

  • The proposed cuts make it impossible to collectively prepare for and respond to healthcare emergencies and jeopardizes healthcare readiness for crises that include natural and man-made disasters, pandemics, and cyber incidents with extended downtime. For more information, click here.

What can I do?

  • Be on alert for a call to action! COTS is working with other regional preparedness and readiness programs in Ohio to advocate to House and Senate appropriators to maintain stable funding for the HPP. We will call on you to help!

House-Passed Reconciliation Bill Cuts Medicaid Coverage to Millions

What is it?

  • The reconciliation bill passed by the House reduces federal funding for the Medicaid program by hundreds of billions of dollars over the next 10 years.

What does it mean?

  • The Medicaid program is the largest single source of health care coverage in the United States, covering nearly half of all children, many low-income elderly and disabled individuals, and working adults in low-wage jobs. The $822 billion in Medicaid cuts included in the House Budget Reconciliation bill is projected by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office to result in the loss of coverage for at least 7.6 million Americans. The cuts will lead to even more crowding of emergency departments, closures of rural hospitals and community physician practices, and widespread health and economic instability.  For more information, read the Coalition of State Medical Associations’ letter to Congress, available on the OSMA’s website

What can I do?

  • Contact Senators Husted and Moreno and share your concerns regarding the impact of the cuts on your patients, your business, and the health care system at large.

Federal Miscellaneous

Trump Administration Enforces Immigration in Formerly “Protected Areas” 

What is it?

  • One of President Trump’s first actions upon taking office was eliminating the existing (at the time) prohibition against enforcing immigration in “protected areas”, which protected certain areas, including healthcare facilities, from immigration enforcement. 

What does it mean?

  • Immigrants seeking health care in a health care facility can be detained or arrested by Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) and Border Patrol (BP) agents. Health care facilities are expending time and resources preparing for ICE and BP raids. Additionally, the fear of such raids is dissuading immigrants from seeking health care and other services. 

What can I do?

  •  Ask the CMA for information about how to educate yourself about this issue. For more information, visit this link.

CMS Rescinds EMTALA Guidance on Emergency Abortions

What is it?

  • The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services rescinded on June 3, 2025, guidance from 2022 that clarified that if a hospital emergency department physician believes that an abortion is the stabilizing treatment necessary to resolve a patient’s emergency medical condition, the physician must provide that treatment, regardless of state law. 

What does it mean?

  • Emergency department physicians must be knowledgeable about the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) and state abortion laws, including the Ohio Reproductive Freedom Amendment, and render clinical decisions based on their understanding of such laws.

What can I do?

  • Stay informed. For more information, see this link

Miscellaneous Updates

Physicians May Be Eligible to Participate in a Huge Blue Cross Blue Shield Settlement Opportunity

What is it?

  • The class action lawsuit, In re: Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust Litigation, addresses Provider Plaintiffs’ claims that Blue Cross Blue Shield (BCBS) violated antitrust laws by illegally dividing the United States into "Service Areas" and agreeing not to compete in those areas. Provider Plaintiffs also claim that BCBS fixed prices for services. The case is pending in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, and both parties have agreed to a Settlement. If approved by the court, the Settlement will establish a $2.8 billion Settlement Fund.

What does it mean?

  • Class Members who are providers who submit a valid approved claim will receive a payment from the Net Settlement Fund if the Settlement is approved. 

What can I do?

  • Submit a claim by going to this link. For additional information, including eligibility criteria, see this article.

Tags:  Advocacy  Federal Policy 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

CMA State Policy Update

Posted By Columbus Medical Association - CMA, Thursday, June 12, 2025
Updated: Thursday, June 12, 2025

CMA State Policy Update

State Budget

The following provisions are included in the Senate-passed version of the state operating budget for state fiscal years 2026-2027 (beginning July 1, 2025). The budget bill will next head to a House-Senate Conference Committee where the content of the bill will change again, meaning some or all of the provisions described below may be changed or eliminated and not become codified in law. You can educate yourself about the provisions of the bill by accessing the bill here and contacting your state legislators, including members of the Conference Committee.

R.C. 9.05 Sex Recognition

What is it?

  • Establishes a state policy recognizing only two sexes, male and female, which “are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality”.

What does it mean?

  • The ability of people who do not identify as male or female or whose sex has changed or will change to access affirming health care will be challenged, as will the ability of health care professionals to provide appropriate healthcare.

R.C. 3701.511 Genetic Services Funds for Abortion Referral or Counsel

What is it?

  • Eliminates the availability of Ohio Department of Health Genetic Services funds to counsel or refer for abortion in the case of a medical emergency.

What does it mean?

  • Medical professionals will be prohibited from using Genetic Services funds to counsel or refer a patient for an abortion. 

R.C. 3701.79, 2919.171 Abortion Reporting Changes

What is it?

  • Requires the abortion report to be completed by an attending physician when an abortion is performed surgically or through abortion-inducing drugs. Also requires that the pregnant woman’s state of residence and her zip code be reported. 

What does it mean?

  • This requirement could result in additional administrative work for attending physicians, but the abortion report is already required, so there may no be real effect for physicians.

R.C. 3705.16, 4731.22 Medical Certificate of Death

What is it?

  • Clarifies that the coroner or medical examiner certifies a death when a decedent dies of criminal or other violent means, while an attending physician certifies the cause of death in all other circumstances. Authorizes the physician who last examined or treated a decedent to certify the decedent’s cause of death and complete and sign the medical certificate of death, but only in the cases where the decedent did not have an attending physician in charge of a patient’s care for the illness or condition that resulted in the patient’s death. Extends the timeline by which a medical certificate of death must be completed and signed, from 48 hours after death to 48 hours after notice of death. Revises existing law provisions that apply when a decedent’s cause of death remains pending. 

What does it mean?

  • Clarifies responsibilities related to medical certificates of death.

R.C. 3748.13 Inspection Fees

What is it?

  • Increases inspection fees for radiation-generating equipment used in facilities operated by medical practitioners or medical practitioner groups

What does it mean?

  • Inspection fees for dental x-ray tube, medical x-ray tube, ionizing radiation-generating equipment, and nonionizing radiation-generating equipment will increase.

R.C. 4730.25, 4731.22, 4759.07, 4760.13, 4761.09, 4762.13, 4772.20, 4774.13, and 4778.14 Summary Suspensions

What is it?

  • Revises the law authorizing  the State Medical Board of Ohio to issue summary suspensions against its license holders by:
    • Eliminating provisions specifying that an order is not subject to suspension by a court before the State Medical Board of Ohio issues its final adjudicative order and, instead, specifies the following: (a) that a summary suspension is not a final appealable order and is not an adjudication that may be appealed under the Administrative Procedure Act and (b) that once a final adjudicative order has been issued, any party adversely affected by it may file an appeal in accordance with the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.
    • Eliminating provisions specifying that the period during which a summary suspension is in effect applies unless reversed on appeal.

R.C. 333.13 Social Gender Transition

What is it?

  • Prohibits Medicaid reimbursement for mental health services that promote or affirm social gender transition.

What does it mean?

  • Individuals will lose access to mental health services, and providers will be tasked with complying with a law that is vague.

R.C. 5163.11 Medicaid Group VIII Eligibility Redeterminations

What is it?

  • Requires the Ohio Department of Medicaid to conduct eligibility requirements for Group VIII enrollees (i.e., the Medicaid expansion population) every six months.

What does it mean?

  • Every six months, Group VIII enrollees’ coverage will be threatened if they are unable to meet Medicaid eligibility requirements, meaning more people will become uninsured. Providers’ population of Medicaid patients is likely to decline, while their population of uninsured patients is likely to increase. 

State Miscellaneous 

OSMA Insurance Reform Effort

The Ohio State Medical Association (OSMA) is launching an Insurance Reform Campaign that seeks to reduce burdens placed on physicians by insurers. According to the OSMA, these bills (House Bills 214, 219, 220 and Senate Bills 160, 162, 164, 165, 166) “will bring much-needed transparency to the insurmountable power insurers have at dictating medical care—power that too often disrupts the ability of physicians to effectively provide patient care, and can lead to patients facing delays and denials of medically-necessary and even life-saving treatments”.  Right now, the call to action is to educate yourself about these bills and be prepared to advocate for them when the time is right.

HB 214 Require Medicaid, Health Insurers Report on Prior Authorization

What is it?

  • Requires health insurers to make prior authorization data available on their websites in a readily accessible format and submit such data in a report to the Ohio Department of Insurance which, in turn, must provide the data to the General Assembly. 
  • Requires health insurers and the Ohio Department of Medicaid (ODM) to exempt a healthcare provider from prior authorization when at least 90% of the provider’s requests for a service, device, or drug within the prior 12 months have been approved.  
  • Permits providers to request evidence from a health insurer or ODM that supports the insurer’s or ODM’s decision to deny an exception, and to appeal that exception. Providers would not be required to initiate a request as a condition of receiving an exemption. Exemptions are to be reviewed after a year. Establishes guidelines for the exception of the review process and permits a provider to appeal an exemption revocation.

HB 219 Establish Network Adequacy Standards for Health Insurers

What is it?

  • Requires health plan issuers to establish and maintain adequate provider networks to ensure all covered benefits are accessible to covered persons. 
  • Requires a health plan issuer to establish and maintain a process to ensure covered persons are able to obtain covered benefits at an in-network level from an out-of-network provider whenever there are not a sufficient number of in-network providers.
  • Requires a health plan issuer to establish and maintain adequate arrangements to ensure all covered persons have reasonable access to in-network providers near the covered person’s home or place of employment. 
  • Requires a health plan issuer to monitor the ability, clinical capacity, and legal authority of in-network providers to furnish covered benefits under the network plan. 
  • Prohibits a health plan issuer from delivering, issuing for delivery, or using a network plan before a copy of the plan, premium rates, and an access arrangement are filed with the Ohio Department of Insurance (ODI). 
  • Requires a health plan issuer to notify the Superintendent of any material change to a network plan or access arrangement within 15 business days of the change or implementation of the change. 
  • Requires a health plan issuer to provide covered persons a directory that identifies which providers and facilities belong to each network and which networks are applicable to each specific plan offered in Ohio. 

HB 220 Regards Health Insurance, Medicaid Prior Authorization 

What is it?

  • Requires health insurers and the Department of Medicaid (ODM) to honor a prior authorization approval if a provider prescribes a change in dosage of an approved drug. 
  • Requires that the name, specialty, and relevant qualifications of the clinical peer, who is required by continuing law to review prior authorization appeals, to be identified. 
  • Prohibits health insurers from charging a fee for appealing an adverse prior authorization determination. 
  • Prohibits health insurers and ODM from retroactively denying a prior authorization for mental health or substance use disorder treatment. 
     

SB 160 Regards Prescription Drugs and Medication Switching

What is it?

  • Prohibits insurers from making mid-year drug formulary changes to avoid abrupt and unwarranted treatment changes that disrupt a physician’s ability to exercise their medical expertise to help their patients.

SB 162 Regards Timing of Health Insurer Recoupment from Providers

What is it?

  •  Shortens the time period in which a payment made by a third-party payer to a provider shall be considered final. 

SB 164 Regulate the Use of Artificial Intelligence by Health Insurers

What is it?

  •  Requires health plan issuers to annually file a report with the Superintendent of insurance covering a variety of information including: each provider in the health plan issuer’s network, the number of covered persons enrolled in health benefit plans issued by the health plan issuer, whether the health plan issuer is using, or will use artificial intelligence-based algorithms in utilization review processes for those health benefit plans, and much more information as listed in the bill. 
  • Prohibits health plan issuers from making a decision regarding the care of a covered person, including the decision to deny, delay, or modify health care services based on medical necessity, based solely on results derived from the use or application of artificial intelligence.

SB 165 Prohibit Denial of Health Insurance Claim for Certain Factors, SB 166 Prohibit Health Insurance, Medicaid Electronic Claim Fees

What is it?

  • Prohibits insurers from imposing any charge, fee, or other payment requirement (including through withholding from payment), on any provider for electronic fund transfers or remittance advice transactions. 

HB 172 Prohibit Mental Health Service to Minors Without Parental Consent

What is it?
  • Prohibits the provision of mental health services by mental health professionals (including psychiatrists) to minors without parental consent
What does it mean?
  • More limited access to mental health services for minors and a greater administrative burden for providers. 
What can I do?
  • The bill was introduced in the House in March and referred to the House Health Committee in March. Interested parties can read more about the bill here and contact the bill sponsor to weigh in.

HB 277 Health Care Workers’ Employment Status

What is it?
  • Specifies conditions under which a health care worker providing services to patients is not an employee of a healthcare worker platform or a healthcare facility for purposes of state overtime and minimum wage requirements, the Bimonthly Pay Law, the Workers’ Compensation Law, the Unemployment Compensation Law, and the Income Tax Law.
What does it mean?
  • Strengthens a health care worker’s ability to be treated as an independent contractor when the health care worker seeks work through a healthcare worker platform. 
What action can I take?
  • The bill was introduced in the House in May and referred to the House Commerce and Labor Committee in May. Interested parties can read more about the bill here and contact the bill sponsor to weigh in.
     

 

Tags:  Advocacy  State Policy Update 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Hospital Preparedness Program - Funding at risk

Posted By Lisa J. Oyer, Monday, May 19, 2025
Updated: Monday, May 19, 2025

Dear COTS Valued Partners,

CMA’s affiliate, COTS, needs your help! President Trump’s proposed federal budget eliminates funding for the Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP), the primary source of funding for health care preparedness and response. COTS coordinates emergency preparedness and response for 36 of Ohio's 88 counties for the Ohio Department of Health, which administers the HPP in Ohio. The complete elimination of this program is an existential threat to the safety of all Ohioans. In addition, the proposed federal budget significantly decreases funding for public health coordination and emergency management. See COTS' impact here.

COTS is taking action by creating awareness with our Board of Trustees, stakeholders, and committee members, and developing an advocacy plan.

You can help! Please email or call one or more of these Representatives who represent districts in COTS’ service area. If you have a personal relationship with any of these Members of Congress or others, we welcome your direct advocacy to them, as well.

  • Bob Latta – House District 5; Covered by Region 4 | Phone: (202) 225-6405
  • Troy Balderson – House District 12; COTS Regions 4, 7, and 8 | Phone: (202) 225-5355 | Email: Rep.Balderson@mail.house.gov
  • Michael Rulli – House District 6; COTS Region 8 | Phone: (202) 225-5705  | Email: michael.rulli@mail.house.gov
  • David Taylor – House District 2; COTS Regions 4, 7 | Phone: (202) 225-3164
  • Joyce Beatty –House  District 3; COTS  Region 4 | Phone: (202) 225-4324 | Email: joyce.beatty@mail.house.gov
  • Jim Jordan – House District 4; COTS Region 4 | Phone: (202) 225-2676
  • *Mike Carey – House District 15; COTS Region 4 | Phone: (202) 225-2015

 *Congressman Carey is also a member of the House Budget Committee, so your advocacy with him will be particularly effective.

The message is simple:

“Congressman/woman, the President’s budget proposes elimination of the Hospital Preparedness Program. The House Energy & Commerce Committee’s marked up reconciliation bill does NOT implement those cuts. Please keep funding for the HPP at current levels. Defunding emergency preparedness programs will not only result in lost lives but significant economic costs, including higher response and recovery expenses, overwhelmed hospitals, and lost productivity. These decisions will place a severe financial burden on our healthcare system, with costs extending well beyond those associated with an immediate disaster. The compounded impact of these cuts will lead to avoidable fatalities, long-term recovery costs, and inefficiencies in addressing regional crises.” 

About the Hospital Preparedness Program

The Hospital Preparedness Program (HPP) Hospital Preparedness Program prepares the health care delivery system to save lives through the development of health care coalitions (HCCs) that incentivize diverse and often competitive health care organizations with differing priorities and objectives to work together. HPP is the only source of federal funding for health care delivery system readiness, intended to improve patient outcomes, minimize the need for federal and supplemental state resources during emergencies, and enable rapid recovery. 

The purpose of the Regional Healthcare Coalition is to provide training and exercises, the coordination of plans, and operational support during emergency response, and to develop policies and procedures that identify responsibilities required for the successful interoperability of coalition partners: hospitals, public health, Emergency Medical Services (EMS), emergency management, and community partners during a major disaster. 

The Ohio HPP activities include:

  • Guidance and development of health care coalitions
  • Management of the Ebola Assessment Hospital (EAH) and Ebola Coalition contracts
  • Participation in the Great Lakes Healthcare Partnership with Ohio, Indiana, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, Michigan, and Chicago
  • Facilitation of Burn Surge planning committee
  • Management of the bed tracking (EMResource), and patient tracking (EMTrack) systems
  • Facilitation and participation in healthcare planning, training and exercises

We appreciate your collective partnership.  Please let me know if you have any questions.

Respectfully,

Sherri

Sherri Kovach, MS, BSN, RN, EMT
President
HIPAA Privacy/Security Officer

Tags:  Advocacy  COTS  Ohio Budget  Public Policy 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Strengthening Our Advocacy: Welcoming Public Policy Consultant Daphne Kackloudis

Posted By Tracy Davidson, CEO, Thursday, May 15, 2025

With research and nonprofit funding concerns, a measles outbreak, and attacks on evidence-based medicine, health care policy and advocacy is more important now than ever. I’m excited to share that we are working with a new public policy consultant to guide us through these turbulent times, help us understand our role, and give us concrete action steps to advocate for public health and our patients.

Daphne Kackloudis is the head of the health care practice at Columbus-based law firm, Brennan Manna Diamond (BMD), a longtime supporter and sponsor of the CMAA. Daphne has broad experience in health care operations, regulatory compliance, board governance, Medicaid, public policy, and government affairs. She works with a number of health care trade and membership-based associations, as well as with physicians group and solo practices.

Consulting with our Board and public policy co-chairs, Drs. Chris Brown and Bill Cotton, we selected Daphne because of her deep understanding of local and state policy, her track record of working with physician-led organizations, and her commitment to advocating for the most vulnerable populations. Her insight into the practical challenges facing both clinicians and patients makes her an ideal partner in helping us elevate the physician voice and shape policies that protect and promote public health.

The physician’s voice is crucial for us to navigate these turbulent times. Policymakers at all levels need to hear from you as experts when policies are concerning or off base. We encourage our membership to keep a close eye out for our advocacy alerts and calls for in-person or written testimony. Additionally, the Ohio State Medical Association (OSMA) is a partner with a strong state-wide voice. Their 2025 top legislative issues can be found here.

It’s also important we hear from our membership. Please let us know your concerns, public policy priorities, and any skills you can offer by submitting the information through this form.

Tags:  Advocacy  Public Policy 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

Advocacy Update: The Ohio Budget and Insurance Reform Legislation

Posted By Public Policy Committee Co-Chairs Dr. Chris Brown & Dr. Bill Cotton, Friday, April 18, 2025

Advocacy icon

The primary concern for our organization and physicians is the Ohio budget and the potential catastrophic impact on Ohioans, especially those in need. The two-year budget passed by the Ohio House of Representatives last week includes a provision that would enable the state to back out of the Kasich-era Medicaid expansion if federal funding is cut. This would put healthcare coverage at risk for nearly 800,000 Ohioans and especially impact children, children’s hospitals, and rural hospitals.

Take Action Today

The budget is now in the hands of the Ohio Senate. We ask that our members and partners reach out to their Senators today to ask that they remove this provision to ensure Ohio’s most vulnerable are protected. Find your Ohio Senator and call their office today!

Insurance Reform Legislation

There is positive news to report. Legislators in the 136th General Assembly have recently introduced a slew of legislation aimed at insurance reform in Ohio. Find a summary of the legislation below, and please consider contacting your representatives in support of these issues.

House Bill 214 - Prior Authorization “Gold Card”

  •  Sponsor(s): Rep. Kevin Miller, (R) Newark
  • Status: In the House Insurance Committee
  • This bill would create a system that rewards healthcare providers who consistently receive a prior authorization approval rate for a specific service or treatment in a 12-month period by establishing a “gold card” exemption from prior authorization requirements. It also contains data sharing requirements which mirror federal CMS requirements set to go into effect in 2027. Insurers would be required to share certain program metrics, such as rates of approval/denial/approval after appeal of urgent and non-urgent requests, with the Ohio Department of Insurance and publicly on their websites.

Senate Bill 160 – Non-Medical Switching

  • Sponsor(s): Sen. Beth Liston, MD, (D) Dublin, Sen. Terry Johnson, (R) McDermott
  • Status: In the Senate Financial Institutions, Insurance, and Technology Committee
  • This legislation would prohibit insurers from non-medical switching or making mid-year drug formulary changes which force patients to undergo abrupt and unwarranted treatment changes.

Senate Bill 165 – Automatic Downcoding

  • Sponsor(s): Sen. Susan Manchester – (R) Waynesfield
  • Status: In the Senate Financial Institutions, Insurance, and Technology Committee
  • SB 165 contains prohibitions on downcoding for all providers, including prohibitions on limitations on reimbursement for time spent with patients. It would also strengthen Ohio’s prudent layperson standard in order to protect Ohioans from unexpected medical bills due to their insurer denying claims for emergency care after the care has been sought and provided.

House Bill 219 – Network Adequacy

  • Sponsor(s): Rep. Kellie Deeter, (R) Norwalk
  • Status: In the House Insurance Committee
  • This bill would require the Ohio Department of Insurance to create network adequacy standards for commercial plans.

Senate Bill 162 – Takebacks/Clawbacks

  • Sponsor(s): Sen. Bill Blessing, (R) Colerain Twp.
  • Status: In the Senate Financial Institutions, Insurance, and Technology Committee
  • This Senate bill would change Ohio’s current 24-month insurer takeback timeframe, decreasing it to the same timeframe given to a provider to submit a claim, and also prohibit insurers from changing these timeframes during a contract period. It would also prohibit insurers from charging a provider for appealing a determination of overpayment.

Senate Bill 166 – No Fees for EFTs

  • Sponsors(s): Sen. Nathan Manning, (R) North Ridgeville
  • Status: In the Senate Medicaid Committee
  • SB 166 would prohibit insurers from imposing any charge, fee, or other payment requirement (including through withholding from payment), on any healthcare provider for electronic fund transfers or remittance advice transactions.

House Bill 220 – Prior Authorization

  • Sponsor(s): Rep. Heidi Workman, (R) Rootstown
  • Status: In the House Insurance Committee
  • HB 220 would strengthen existing Ohio prior authorization laws passed in 2018 by ensuring retroactive denials only occur in the event of non-covered benefits or lack of coverage at the time of service, requiring identification of clinical peer conducting peer review in adverse determinations, prohibiting insurers from charging providers for appeals, and requiring insurers to account for dosage adjustments in drug prior authorizations to treat chronic conditions.

Senate Bill 164 – Transparency in Health Plan Use of AI

  • Sponsor(s): Sen. Al Cutrona, (R) Canfield
  • Status: In the Senate Financial Institutions, Insurance, and Technology Committee
  • This proposed legislation would require insurer transparency in their use of AI tools in prior authorization determinations, specifically by requiring insurers to disclose use of AI and ensuring that prior authorization determinations are made through review of individual merits of claims by licensed clinical professionals.

Get Involved

The role of our Public Policy Committee and Advocacy Community is to monitor legislation that impacts physicians and assist them in getting their voices heard on the issues that matter most. If you’d like to get involved, go to the Advocacy page on our website and watch for updates on upcoming policy meetings.

Tags:  Advocacy  Ohio Budget 

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Page 2 of 2
1  |  2